
“You’ve been watching too many foreign movies, Father Saenz; there are no serial killers in the Philippines, and if there were, they would be white males in their thirties.”
I used to read Nancy Drew in high school. I was very amazed by how this teenage girl could solve millions of cases from its first publishing up to the present. Then I became addicted to Medical Investigation, Crime Scene Investigation, Jake 2.0, Without a Trace, Blind Justice, and almost every sleuthing show on television. I enjoyed all those and dreamt of becoming a detective as well. But that was long ago. Seeing all these in my present perspective, I realized how well the United States solve small to big time crimes. Of course, they have intelligent people, high-class equipment and facilities and comprehensive FBI database making justice easy to achieve. Then I wonder, why is it not like that in the Philippines? Why is justice so hard to achieve in this country of ours?
A detective story in Philippine literature? For sure?
This was my reaction when I started reading “Smaller and Smaller Circles” by F.H. Batacan for our preliminary exam in Philippine Literature class. Reading the book made me remember my excitement when reading Nancy Drew way before. But this time, the book gave me more than fancy excitement. I was amazed by how this Filipina author (yes, F.H. Batacan is a female) could craft this detective story (Mary Higgins Clark, eh?) set in the Philippines, with Filipino characters, and within Philippine circumstances. This novel even made more impact to me compared to Nancy Drew and CSI. It made me realize that the Americans are not the only ones who could create such thrill in readers or viewers. Filipinos can do it, too, after all. When everyone was going crazy over Stephenie Meyer, I was, on the other hand, going gaga over F.H. Batacan. Sorry, I’m not a Twilight fan.
The novel is about the argument whether there are serial killers in the Philippines or if there are not. The one I quoted in the lead is what the PNP has said to Father Augusto Saenz, the protagonist in the story. He is a Jesuit priest and a forensic anthropologist who believes otherwise. He is helped by another Jesuit priest, Father Jerome Lucero, who is a clinical psychologist and a former student of Saenz. I also believed before that the stories of psycho killers spreading around were not true, that they have just been made up. The quote above was the same claim of my History professor when the news about a psycho killer slashing off breasts of virgin women was at its peak. She said that psycho killing is Western by nature. But with a lot of unsolved murder stories just around the metro, body parts scattered around the streets, news about journalists found dead everywhere, who knows if there really is one?
The story revolves around a series of killings happening in Payatas wherein people would find dead bodies of little boys around eight to ten years of age among the garbage. They were naked, the heart and stomach taken out, genitals removed and faces skinned off. I remember reading these descriptions in the book while eating at McDonalds. Very horrible!
Father Saenz is given the task to solve the mystery behind it with the struggle against the arrogant Atty. Benjamin Arcinas of the NBI who thinks of the priest’s theory as invalid. But in the course of the events in the story, Saenz proves his theory correct. His serial killer is a psychologically-disturbed dentist in the barangay mobile clinic. Of all people, my Lord! This dentist, Alex Carlos, has a tragic childhood. He was sexually abused by his P.E. teacher when he was still in elementary and this experience made him attack innocent kids every first Saturday of the month. It somewhat gives him the chance to revenge indirectly. In the end, however, Saenz and Lucero succeeded the ordeal. Alex died in the course of the chase which also put Saenz’s life at risk. If the old NBI Director had not given this case to this learned forensic anthropologist with a brand new different belief other than the majority of the police, a dead body of a child would still be mourned for amidst the garbage pile every first Saturday of the month.
Are our own police force, detectives and lawyers slow and incapable that’s why most cases we hear about are not solved? Or is it because there are possibilities that these authorities are afraid to consider? Possible suspects of crimes are shown on television but, usually, it just ends there. Oh, justice, why are you so hard to find?
Maybe that’s why there are brilliant writers and TV producers. They extend messages to people. I’m not even sure if justice is really easy to attain in the States. I don’t know if what they write about Nancy Drew and how on CSI refer to close reality. But since I am a Filipino, I know that what Batacan wrote is based on the real scenario.
Sometimes, all we got to do it read, observe, listen, and watch not only what foreign fad dictates but also what the brilliant mind of our fellow Filipinos could offer. That is simply giving justice to our identity as Filipinos.
I used to read Nancy Drew in high school. I was very amazed by how this teenage girl could solve millions of cases from its first publishing up to the present. Then I became addicted to Medical Investigation, Crime Scene Investigation, Jake 2.0, Without a Trace, Blind Justice, and almost every sleuthing show on television. I enjoyed all those and dreamt of becoming a detective as well. But that was long ago. Seeing all these in my present perspective, I realized how well the United States solve small to big time crimes. Of course, they have intelligent people, high-class equipment and facilities and comprehensive FBI database making justice easy to achieve. Then I wonder, why is it not like that in the Philippines? Why is justice so hard to achieve in this country of ours?
A detective story in Philippine literature? For sure?
This was my reaction when I started reading “Smaller and Smaller Circles” by F.H. Batacan for our preliminary exam in Philippine Literature class. Reading the book made me remember my excitement when reading Nancy Drew way before. But this time, the book gave me more than fancy excitement. I was amazed by how this Filipina author (yes, F.H. Batacan is a female) could craft this detective story (Mary Higgins Clark, eh?) set in the Philippines, with Filipino characters, and within Philippine circumstances. This novel even made more impact to me compared to Nancy Drew and CSI. It made me realize that the Americans are not the only ones who could create such thrill in readers or viewers. Filipinos can do it, too, after all. When everyone was going crazy over Stephenie Meyer, I was, on the other hand, going gaga over F.H. Batacan. Sorry, I’m not a Twilight fan.
The novel is about the argument whether there are serial killers in the Philippines or if there are not. The one I quoted in the lead is what the PNP has said to Father Augusto Saenz, the protagonist in the story. He is a Jesuit priest and a forensic anthropologist who believes otherwise. He is helped by another Jesuit priest, Father Jerome Lucero, who is a clinical psychologist and a former student of Saenz. I also believed before that the stories of psycho killers spreading around were not true, that they have just been made up. The quote above was the same claim of my History professor when the news about a psycho killer slashing off breasts of virgin women was at its peak. She said that psycho killing is Western by nature. But with a lot of unsolved murder stories just around the metro, body parts scattered around the streets, news about journalists found dead everywhere, who knows if there really is one?
The story revolves around a series of killings happening in Payatas wherein people would find dead bodies of little boys around eight to ten years of age among the garbage. They were naked, the heart and stomach taken out, genitals removed and faces skinned off. I remember reading these descriptions in the book while eating at McDonalds. Very horrible!
Father Saenz is given the task to solve the mystery behind it with the struggle against the arrogant Atty. Benjamin Arcinas of the NBI who thinks of the priest’s theory as invalid. But in the course of the events in the story, Saenz proves his theory correct. His serial killer is a psychologically-disturbed dentist in the barangay mobile clinic. Of all people, my Lord! This dentist, Alex Carlos, has a tragic childhood. He was sexually abused by his P.E. teacher when he was still in elementary and this experience made him attack innocent kids every first Saturday of the month. It somewhat gives him the chance to revenge indirectly. In the end, however, Saenz and Lucero succeeded the ordeal. Alex died in the course of the chase which also put Saenz’s life at risk. If the old NBI Director had not given this case to this learned forensic anthropologist with a brand new different belief other than the majority of the police, a dead body of a child would still be mourned for amidst the garbage pile every first Saturday of the month.
Are our own police force, detectives and lawyers slow and incapable that’s why most cases we hear about are not solved? Or is it because there are possibilities that these authorities are afraid to consider? Possible suspects of crimes are shown on television but, usually, it just ends there. Oh, justice, why are you so hard to find?
Maybe that’s why there are brilliant writers and TV producers. They extend messages to people. I’m not even sure if justice is really easy to attain in the States. I don’t know if what they write about Nancy Drew and how on CSI refer to close reality. But since I am a Filipino, I know that what Batacan wrote is based on the real scenario.
Sometimes, all we got to do it read, observe, listen, and watch not only what foreign fad dictates but also what the brilliant mind of our fellow Filipinos could offer. That is simply giving justice to our identity as Filipinos.
